Our Republic May End With The Stroke of a Pen

| 22 Comments | No TrackBacks

By Elmer Beauregard

On July 4, 1776, with the stroke of a pen, our Republic was founded when the Declaration of Independence was signed. On December 7, 2009, with another stroke of the pen, our Republic might come to end.

Lord Christopher Monckton recently spoke at an event put on by the Minnesota Free Market Institute, he SHREDDED the whole "Global Warming" theory, he was great! But it was his closing statement that shocked me.

When I started Minnesotan's For Global Warming, I knew the whole Global Warming theory was a joke. It was easy to make fun of the whole thing, especially with a cooling planet, and to portray Al Gore as a buffoon. Little did I realize that the "Global Warming" theory would be the excuse needed to set up a One World Communistic Government.

Monckton's Closing Remarks

At the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think they're going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won't sign it.


I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word "government" actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfaction of what is called, coyly, "climate debt" - because we've been burning CO2 and they haven't. We've been screwing up the climate and they haven't. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement.

How many of you think that the word "election" or "democracy" or "vote" or "ballot" occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesn't appear once. So, at last, the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement, who took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left within a year, because [the communists] captured it - Now the apotheosis as at hand. They are about to impose a communist world government on the world. You have a president who has very strong sympathies with that point of view. He's going to sign it. He'll sign anything. He's a Nobel Peace Prize [winner]; of course he'll sign it.

And the trouble is this; if that treaty is signed, if your Constitution says that it takes precedence over your Constitution (sic), and you can't resign from that treaty unless you get agreement from all the other state parties - And because you'll be the biggest paying country, they're not going to let you out of it.

So, thank you, America. You were the beacon of freedom to the world. It is a privilege merely to stand on this soil of freedom while it is still free. But, in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your humanity away forever. And neither you nor any subsequent government you may elect will have any power whatsoever to take it back. That is how serious it is. I've read the treaty. I've seen this stuff about [world] government and climate debt and enforcement. They are going to do this to you whether you like it or not.

But I think it is here, here in your great nation, which I so love and I so admire - it is here that perhaps, at this eleventh hour, at the fifty-ninth minute and fifty-ninth second, you will rise up and you will stop your president from signing that dreadful treaty, that purposeless treaty. For there is no problem with climate and, even if there were, an economic treaty does nothing to [help] it.

So I end by saying to you the words that Winston Churchill addressed to your president in the darkest hour before the dawn of freedom in the Second World War. He quoted from your great poet Longfellow:

Sail on, O Ship of State!

Sail on, O Union, strong and great!

Humanity with all its fears,

With all the hopes of future years,

Is hanging breathless on thy fate!



Here is the 3 points of the treaty that Mr. Monckton was speaking of:

38. The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention will be based on three basic pillars: government; facilitative mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization of which will include the following:

World Government (heading added)

(a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will operate as such, as appropriate.

To Redistribute Wealth (heading added)

b) The Convention's financial mechanism will include a multilateral climate change fund including five windows: (a) an Adaptation window, (b) a Compensation window, to address loss and damage from climate change impacts [read: the "climate debt" Monckton refers to], including insurance, rehabilitation and compensatory components, © a Technology window; (d) a Mitigation window; and (e) a REDD window, to support a multi-phases process for positive forest incentives relating to REDD actions.

With Enforcement Authority (heading added)

c) The Convention's facilitative mechanism will include: (a) work programmes for adaptation and mitigation; (b) a long-term REDD process; © a short-term technology action plan; (d) an expert group on adaptation established by the subsidiary body on adaptation, and expert groups on mitigation, technologies and on monitoring, reporting and verification; and (e) an international registry for the monitoring, reporting and verification of compliance of emission reduction commitments, and the transfer of technical and financial resources from developed countries to developing countries. The secretariat will provide technical and administrative support, including a new centre for information exchange [read; enforcement].

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.minnesotansforglobalwarming.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2323

22 Comments

Elmer,
No light hearted banter this time. I want the left to pass every stupid idea they have ever had into law so there will be no holding back when we storm the bastions of power. The day is coming soon and every true American will know his duty. Man up, clean your rifle and fill your magazines. We will regain our freedom together or die trying. Defend the Constitution!
Mike

Lord Mockton has articulated a very sobering prognostication. I have long believed "global warming" to be the hoax it is, while at the same time uncomfortably harboring the fear that it would be a vehicle of conspiracy against capitalism and, more importantly, individual freedom. This is very scary stuff. May God help us.

PASS THIS ON: In March, 2008, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that only true federal legislation (an Act approved by both houses of Congress and signed or voted into law) could mandate states to respect the order of a foreign court. Since the Insular Cases of the early 20th century, the SC has held that a treaty cannot supercede US federal or state law. Treaties are signed by the Executive and ratified by the Senate, but because the House is not included in the process, they are NOT "law".

This is good to know, but, Congress has already passed Cap and Trade, so it has agreed in Principal to carbon tax legislation.

Well, technically the Senate hasn't passed it yet, but yes, they've proven they are a bunch of lefty weenies. Nevertheless, the globalists will want people to believe that the treaty will be "it", but if the House wants to make it law, they will have to put their votes on the line to do it, and we need to hold teir feet to the fire.

On a more cynical note. What wealth is left to transfer from one country to the other?

Aren't we like $45 trillion in debt?

Our economy is already in decline and once taxes go up more, people with either leave, stop working or revolt.

What scares me more than what Obama is doing is the lack of a clear Reaganesque leader to guide the revolution when it occurs. We need one or the revolution will self-destruct.

The key to the plot is that CO2 that is emitted in one country is inevitably crossing all borders to other countries. There's no way the atmosphere can be walled off from a country. As long as the greens were claiming "air pollution", "smog" and even "acid rain" to be the problem, there were still regional limitations, now however it's about the global atmosphere, and once the idea of global warming and CO2 causing it is accepted as true, it is logically also true that all nations need to centrally organize to control CO2.
They want us to believe they are concerned about the problem of global warming, and so they reluctantly have to establish a worldwide control system to monitor and restrict CO2, in reality of course, they always wanted the worldwide control mechanism, and then "invented" the global warming nonsense in order to achieve it.

"Fraud will vitiate any, even the most solemn transactions; and any asserted title founded upon it, is utterly void."

"In the solemn treaties between nations it never can be presumed that either state intends to provide the means of perpetrating or protecting frauds; but all the provisions are to be construed as intended to be applied to bona fide transactions."

(http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/amistad/AMI_CT2.HTM)

Elmer,

I was concerned after reading your post and the speech transcript from Lord Monckton, so

I asked the following question on Answers.com, and here is my question along with their answer.

Q: Who has the right to relinquish US sovereignty?

A: It seems unlikely that the US would ever agree to relinquish its sovereignty, however, if such a thing were to happen, it would be by act of Congress, duly signed by the President. Perhaps someday the nations of the world will seek to create a world government to which they will all be subject, and if so, that would be done by means of a treaty, which would be created by the same legal mechanism as any other treaty, even though its consequences would be much more far-reaching.

I feel a bit better now. But of course, I realise that laws and the Constitution were ment to be broken, especially by this administration.

It's not being presented as a Sovereignty issue though. The President will sign it and he only needs the Senate to ratify it and they will because they think they will be saving the planet.

Elmer,

Thanks so much for printing my comment, and replying to it.

I understand your fears that such a thing could happen, but I believe that if nothing else, Senators crave power, and, as part of another "world government", they probably would have far less. Thus, I don't believe they are stupid enough to sign away their power by ratifying a treaty that does away with their Sovereignty, even if it is being billed as a plan to save the planet. They don't actually believe this tripe, they only pretend to in order to convince their constituents that they know best. More likely, I believe is that they would do whatever they think is in their own interest, even if just for the short term. (Their egos would lead them to believe that in the end, they would still be able to make some kind of deal that would save themselves, above the rest of the planet, if it came to it.)

Perhaps a useful example: The US signs treaties of extradition all the time, but there is a Law in place which authorizes their terms to be carried out, and then, only insofar as the terms of the Law allow.
Treaties can be ignored, of course. The pre-1903 US treaty with Columbia required it to put down revolts in the then province of Panama by force of arms. When the Panamanian revolution happened, the US ignored multiple written demands from Columbia to do just that.

The US is not bound by any treaty unless or until the Senate ratifies it.

Article II, section 2, of the Constitution states that the president "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur."

Additionally, the Constitution is silent on the subject of termination of treaties. But historically presidents have terminated treaties unilaterally, as when Jimmy Carter terminated the US defense treaty with Taiwan.

IMO, enough Democratic senators have told Obama that he ought not sign anything that comes out of Copenhagen. I will be very surprised if he signs a treaty or any other agreement that requires ratification. So what Lord Monckton fears will happen, is most unlikely to happen.

this really assists, today i happen the troubles and i donot know how to resolve,
i search yahoo and found your blog,
thanks again

just one thing, can i post this entry on my site? i will add the source and credit to your site.

regards!

Admiring the time and effort you put into your blog and detailed information you offer! I will bookmark your blog and have my children check up here often. Thumbs up!

You made some good points there. I did a search on the topic and found most people will agree with your blog.

This blog is very educative,the posts are also educative too.
thanks very much.I will tell my friends about it so that they can come
and read this educative articles too.

Well thought out site.

dude, do some more!! I WANT MORE!!! thank you so much.

Awesome article. Liked reading it. Have book-marked your web page! Packed with decent advice. Best wishes. Chris

Leave a comment

September 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            


Powered by Movable Type 5.12
DonateBanner.jpg








About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Elmer published on October 16, 2009 9:10 AM.

Government Propaganda To Infest Network TV Shows was the previous entry in this blog.

Copenhagen climate change talks are last chance, says Gordon Brown is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



VibeAdSmall.jpg


FreezeDryGuy.jpg