Breaking News: Trees Love CO2!

| 2 Comments

FoxNews

Forests could be growing faster now than they were 225 years ago as a result of global warming, a study has revealed.

Swiss Forests_monster_397x224.JPGForests could be growing faster now than they were 225 years ago as a result of global warming, a study has revealed.

The study, published on Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found evidence that trees in the eastern United States were growing at an accelerated rate due to the rising levels of atmospheric CO2, higher temperatures and longer growing seasons.

Scientists in Maryland, VA documented changes to the growth of 55 plots of mixed hardwood forest over 22 years, and concluded the younger trees were growing much quicker than the eldest trees in the study, which were 225-years-old, a Smithsonian Environmental Research Center (SERC) blog reported Monday.

Forest ecologist Geoffrey Parker of the SERC and Sean McMahon of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute discovered that, on average, the forest was growing an additional two tons per acre annually, the equivalent of a tree with a diameter of two feet sprouting up over a year.

The scientists agreed that if the older trees had grown at the same rate throughout their lives as the younger trees were now, they would be much larger.

Parker began his tree census work Sept. 8, 1987, and measured all trees that were 0.8 inches or more in diameter, and then identified their species. By knowing the species and diameter, he was able to calculate the trees biomass.

During the past 22 years CO2 levels at SERC rose 12 percent, the temperature increased by nearly three-tenths of a degree Celsius and the growing season lengthened by 7.8 days. Parker and McMahon suggested that a combination of these factors caused the forest's accelerated biomass gain.

2 Comments

I would expect trees have grown faster in the last in the last 22 years than they did 225 years ago! Two hundred plus years ago the northern hemisphere was still going through the "little ice age", therefore temperatures were lower and growing seasons were shorter! Did these "scientists" take that into consideration? Probably not, since climate scientists have left the "little ice age" and the "medieval warming period" that preceded it off of their "hockey stick" graphs.

I visit regularly and always something interesting like this is posted. I found a pretty useful site http://www.rapidskunk.com/Black-Eyed-Peas---Rock-That-Body-(2010).html if you would like to check it out. Thanks again.

September 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            


Powered by Movable Type 5.12
DonateBanner.jpg








About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Elmer published on February 2, 2010 11:22 AM.

Strange Environmentalist Bed Fellows was the previous entry in this blog.

Michael Mann as innocent as OJ - possibly more so - finds internal Penn State investigation is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



VibeAdSmall.jpg


FreezeDryGuy.jpg